Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"

From sureai
Jump to: navigation, search
m
(Out of Date?)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
== Out of Date? ==
 +
Activity on this wiki seems to have dropped off since 2019. Much of this wiki has not kept up with the changes in this mod, so it now contains many inaccuracies. There is now a competing Enderal wiki in Fandom, which is quite active, but is missing a lot of the information in this wiki. Would the owners of this wiki consider granting copyright permission to allow contributors to copy information from this wiki to that one?
 +
[[User:Tungstic|Tungstic]] ([[User talk:Tungstic|talk]]) 19:03, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
 +
 
==Layout of the Enderal subsection==
 
==Layout of the Enderal subsection==
 
Should we fix this page so the Enderal sub-section matches [[Enderal]] or visa-versa? [[User:Dimecoin|Dimecoin]] ([[User talk:Dimecoin|talk]]) 17:07, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
 
Should we fix this page so the Enderal sub-section matches [[Enderal]] or visa-versa? [[User:Dimecoin|Dimecoin]] ([[User talk:Dimecoin|talk]]) 17:07, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:03, 28 September 2021

Out of Date?

Activity on this wiki seems to have dropped off since 2019. Much of this wiki has not kept up with the changes in this mod, so it now contains many inaccuracies. There is now a competing Enderal wiki in Fandom, which is quite active, but is missing a lot of the information in this wiki. Would the owners of this wiki consider granting copyright permission to allow contributors to copy information from this wiki to that one? Tungstic (talk) 19:03, 28 September 2021 (UTC)

Layout of the Enderal subsection

Should we fix this page so the Enderal sub-section matches Enderal or visa-versa? Dimecoin (talk) 17:07, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

There are so many subpages for Enderal already - and their number will still be growing - that the idea of "quicklinks" on the main page becomes counterproductive: If we re-create the full scope of links to Enderal subpages (or to subpages of the other games if their sections will be extended in the future) here, the main page will become cluttered. If we just present a selection of links, it might prevent users from visiting the actual "game portal pages" like Enderal becuase they believe these few selected links represent the full scope of what is covered, missing the rest of the information that the Enderal namespace provides. So we should concentrate on finding a good structure from Enderal onward, discussing the layout of the "portal page" here. --Holomay (talk) 08:47, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
yea, that will be easier to maintain too, since we only have to update one "main" page now :) Dimecoin (talk) 14:42, 16 September 2016 (UTC)