Out of Date?
Activity on this wiki seems to have dropped off since 2019. Much of this wiki has not kept up with the changes in this mod, so it now contains many inaccuracies. There is now a competing Enderal wiki in Fandom, which is quite active, but is missing a lot of the information in this wiki. Would the owners of this wiki consider granting copyright permission to allow contributors to copy information from this wiki to that one? Tungstic (talk) 19:03, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
The official wiki page is owned by SureAI. However, all contributions are created by users, so there are no copyright problems if used for non-commercial (!) purposes.
My personal opinion: what sense does a "competing" wiki make (do you have a link?)?
Especially the official English wiki is largely complete. That's why there is not much activity there anymore. Certainly there will be useful additions here and there.
So why not actively improve the official wiki?
Layout of the Enderal subsection
Should we fix this page so the Enderal sub-section matches Enderal or visa-versa? Dimecoin (talk) 17:07, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
- There are so many subpages for Enderal already - and their number will still be growing - that the idea of "quicklinks" on the main page becomes counterproductive: If we re-create the full scope of links to Enderal subpages (or to subpages of the other games if their sections will be extended in the future) here, the main page will become cluttered. If we just present a selection of links, it might prevent users from visiting the actual "game portal pages" like Enderal becuase they believe these few selected links represent the full scope of what is covered, missing the rest of the information that the Enderal namespace provides. So we should concentrate on finding a good structure from Enderal onward, discussing the layout of the "portal page" here. --Holomay (talk) 08:47, 16 September 2016 (UTC)